Day 2: An Independent, with Limits

If the right Republican came along, I would consider voting for him or her.

For a long time, I believed that. At least I wanted to believe that I was the kind of person who could listen — open-mindedly, exploring all the options — and then make a voting decision, regardless of party affiliation. I mean, I am an Independent after all, have been registered as such all my voting life.

But, seriously, who am I kidding?

I cannot cast a vote in support of a Republican candidate, in support of the party that never fails to ignore the needs of the underclass and the middle class. The party that never fails to find ways to evoke people of color (especially black people) as the problem. Recall, for one, Newt Gingrich’s recent comments regarding blacks and the need for welfare reform (which, by the way, is eerily similar to what Gingrich was saying back in the late 1990s. Why would he want to take us back there?).

No Republican candidate has shown me anything to suggest that the past is really passed with regards to race. As William Faulkner said, “The past is never past. It is always present.” Conservatives never fail to play on the fears and racist attitudes embedded in the recesses of the American psyche. Apparently, to evoke with a difference W.E.B. DuBois, the problem of the 21st century continues to be the problem of the color line — at least for conservatives.

And, despite what people might say, my position really has nothing to do with Obama’s identity as a black man and as the first black President of this country. And I’m not giving him a pass because his wife, Michelle, is progressively minded. No. The lack of positive change on his watch troubles me as well. But, unlike some people I’ve heard talk about how they plan to vote in November, I am not willing to give my vote to a Republican, to help vote a conservative into office, so that things can get worse thereby forcing the Democrats to really fight for change. Too risky. Who, really, can afford a Republican administration right now? And, in that scenario, who can afford it when the Democrats don’t fight?

Quiet as it’s kept, we did not vote a Progressive into office in 2008. He may have looked Progressive given the Bush II years, but he wasn’t. He’s a Democrat. In an office that seems to resist progressivism. I voted for him before and will again. And then I’ll continue to support and push for progress at the grassroots level, from the bottom up — where it has, historically, thrived.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Day 2: An Independent, with Limits

  1. David K says:

    The frustrating part is that Republicans, of course, would deny all of your accusations. They would say, “No, you have us all wrong. Of course we want to help the working people and the underclasses. We just think the way to do that is to expand the size of the economic pie, remove rules, and everybody will benefit to the extent of their abilities and hard work.” The problem is, a) they are lying and b) even if they aren’t lying, their ideas have generally proven to be wrong, factually. They would counter that all of the Democrats’ “social programs” have also failed, and there is a lot of truth to that. So how do you get out of this damn circle of rhetoric? Very difficult. (Cenk is quite good at it at debunking their BS arguments. Of course he was pretty good back when you first met him, making the exact opposite arguments – the ones I quoted above.)

  2. Sharad Vivek says:

    Not to generalize, but i think many of “us” have come up thru the ranks of political thought and settled on the “socially liberal/fiscally conservative” label. To many purists/extremists this comes off as a cop-out. I dont think so, rather its a clear example of how polarized our politics are that we have so much trouble finding a middle ground because hot-button issues ended up yanking everyone towards their respective corners.

    I think as i’ve aged, i’ve become more fiscally conservative (and no, its not b/c of my amazing successes in business..;). But its some gross simplification of i dont trust the govt to hold itself accountable or maintain any semblance of pseudo-efficiency (granted, govt’s role is not to be efficient), and I dont trust the private sector to provide any of the services we need to prosper as a society….in short, i have realized that i just hate everyone.

    • I hear you — the discussion is so polarized. How can change and effectiveness actually happen? I’ve been thinking a lot about a more progressive politics, but can such a politics function in Washington?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s